Chaos Theory and the Hollander Psychodrama Curve: Trusting the Process
Keywords:
PsychodramaAbstract
Both psychodrama and chaos theories address the complex dynamics of human interaction and change. When juxtaposed, not only can their commonalities be seen, but also each theory can contribute synergistically to the utility of the other. To accomplish that end, the author presents the constructs of chaos theory first. Then, the major constructs of psychodrama theory are reviewed, through the use of the Hollander (1969) Psychodrama Curve. Finally, each theory is employed to enhance the understanding and application of the other. The case is made that accommodating the melding of subjective and objective perspectives, sought by Moreno (1951), may finally be accomplished through the combination of the two theories. Particular attention is paid to the philosophical consistency of the theories. Two major conclusions are reached: Spontaneity is essential to dealing with dynamical systems; and trust in the process-psychodramatic and chaotic-is key to change involving human dynamical systems.
References
Butz, M. R. (1997). Chaos and complexity: Implications for psychological theory and practice. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Corsini, R. J., & Cardone, S. (1966). Roleplaying in psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Crutchfield, J.P., Farmer, J. D., Packard, N. H., & Shaw, R. S. (1995). Chaos. In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy, & A. Peacocke (Eds.), Chaos and complexity: Scientific perspectives on divine action (pp. 35 49). Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications and The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, Berkeley, CA.
Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking Penguin.
Goerner, S. J. (1994). Chaos and the evolving ecological universe. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 4, 529-573.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Godel, Escher; Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Vintage Books.
Hollander, C. E. (1969). A process for psychodrama training: The Hollander psychodrama curve. Denver, CO: Snow Lion Press.
Kafatos, M. (Ed.). (1989). Bell's theorem, quantum theory and conceptions of the universe. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Moreno, J. L. (1951). Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society: An approach to a new political orientation. Ambler, PA: Beacon House.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Price, W. C., & Chissick, S.S. (Eds.). (1977). The uncertainty principle and foundations of quantum mechanics: A fifty years' survey. New York: Wiley.
Remer, R. (1983). You see what you look for. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 61, 585-586. '
Remer, R. (1990). Family therapy inside-out. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 43, 7081.
Remer, R. (1996) Chaos theory and the canon of creativity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 48, 145-155.
Remer, R., & Betts, G. R. (1997). The difference between strict analogue and interpersonal psychodramatic simulation methodology (/PS) in research on human dynamical systems. Unpublished manuscript.
Tinsley, H. E. A. (1997). Synergistic analysis of structured essays: A large-sample, discovery oriented, qualitative research approach. The Counseling Psychologist, 4, 573-586.
Wildman, W. J., & Russell, R. J. (1995) Chaos: A mathematical introduction with philosophical reflections. In R. J. Russell, N. Murphy, & A. Peacocke (Eds.), Chaos and complexity: Scientific perspectives on divine action (pp. 49-93). Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications and The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, Berkeley, CA.
Wundt, W. (1912). An introduction to psychology. London, England: George Allen.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.