A Comparison of the Effects of Different Sociometry Components on Personal and Interpersonal Growth

Authors

  • RORY REMER Author
  • VICKEY S. FINGER Author

Keywords:

Sociometry

Abstract

In this study, the authors compared the effects of different sociometry components for producing personal and interpersonal growth both in and outside a group context. Starting with "near" (weak) sociometry (the perception of others' social desirability in stated contexts), participants progressed through four phases, the last encompassing full (strong) sociometric involvement (choosing according to a specific criterion, implementation of the choices, and disclosure and exploration of the reasons behind the choices). Multivariate and univariate analyses supported the contention that complete involvement produced the most positive effects on all dependent variables.

References

Carlson-Sabelli, L., Sabelli, H. C., Patel, M., & Holm, K. (1992). The union of opposites in sociometry. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 44, 147--172.

Moreno, J. L. (1951 ). Sociometry, experimental method, and the science of society: An approach to a new political orientation. Ambler, PA: Beacon House/Horsham Foundation.

Remer, R. (1995a). Strong sociometry: A definition, Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 48, 69-73.

Remer, R. (1995b). Using strong sociometry: Some guidelines and techniques. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 48, 74 78.

Remer, R., Lima, G. C., Richey-Suttles, S., White, S., & Gentile, T. J. (1995). Using strong sociometry as an interpersonal feedback tool. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 48, 79--83.

Published

2025-03-14