A Reexamination of the Tele Effect

Authors

  • ALTON BARBOUR Author

Keywords:

Reexamination

Abstract

Sometimes our awareness of it is distinct and sometimes it is barely perceptible, but we often find that we "hit it off' or "are in synch" with some people and not with others, and that however we feel about them, they in turn often feel the same way about us. This mutuality of feeling with another person is what Moreno called "the tele effect." The variable of tele has been observed by social scientists since the I 930s, and yet what actually happens when tele is experienced is not well understood. In fact it might be said that it is often misunderstood, possibly because of the metaphorical language that has been used to describe it, possibly because empathy is
difficult to conceptualize, and possibly because empirical research in interpersonal perception and attraction has developed only in recent years. In this article, I examine some of the relevant social and behavioral science literature in communication theory, interpersonal perception, interpersonal attraction, and empathy in order to advance some possible explanations for the tele-effect phenomenon and to formulate a reconceptualization of the construct.

References

Barbour, A. (1981). Training in interpersonal competence. Journal of the Communication Association of the Pacific, 103), 43--50.

Bateson, G. (1970). Mind and nature. New York: Bantam Books.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of the mind. New York: Balantine.

Benesh-Weiner, M. (Ed). 1988. Fritz Heider-The notebooks, balance theory (Vol. 4). Munich: Psychologie Verlangs Union.

Berscheid, E., & walster, E. (1972). Beauty and the best. Psychology Today, March, 5(3), 42- 74.

Brown, R. (1965). Social Psychology. New York: Free Press.

Combs, A., & Snygg, D. (1959). Individual behavior. New York: Harper.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

Laing, R. D., Philipson, H., & Lee, A. R. (1966). lnterpersonal perception. London: Tavistock Publications.

Larson, C., Backlund, P., Redmond, M., & Barbour, A. (1979). Assessing functional communication. Falls Church, VA.: ERIC/RCS.

Lerner, M. J. (1971). All the world loathes a loser. Psychology Today, 4(6), 51-66.

Lindzey, G., & Byrne, D. (1968). Measurement of social choice and interpersonal attractiveness. In G. Lindzey, .and E. Aronson (Eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology (2nd ed.). (Vol 2). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Money, J. (1986). Lovemaps: Clinical concepts of sexual/erotic health and pathology, paraphilia, and gender transposition in childhood, adolescence, and maturity. New York: Irvington.

Moreno, J. L.. (1934). Who shall survive? Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing.

Moreno, J. L. (1953). Who shall survive? Beacon, NY: Beacon House.

Redmond, M. V. (1985). The relationship between perceived communication competence and perceived empathy. Communication Monographs, 52, 377-382.

Smith, D., & Williamson, L. K. (1977). Interpersonal communication. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

Published

2025-03-14