Sociometry and Educationally Handicapped Children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12926/42atkk62Keywords:
ChildrenAbstract
Sociometry is presented here as a useful method both for understanding peer relations and assisting in the development of intervention plans for educationally handicapped children. I provide descriptions of my previous research investigations with deaf and severely emotionally disturbed youth and then offer applied case examples drawn from my practice as a school psychologist. I conclude that sociometric assessments, given their advantages, are well suited to assist educators in meeting the challenges of school change.
References
Ballard, M., Corman, L., Gottlieb, J., & Kaufman, M. J. (1977). Improving the social status of mainstreamed retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 605--611.
Bierman, K. L., & Furman, W. (1984). The effects of social skills training and peer involvement on the social adjustment of preadolescents. Child Development, 55, 151-162.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
Conners, C. K. (1989). Manual for Conners' Rating Scales. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliot, S. N. (1984). Assessment and classification of children's social skills: A review of methods and issues. School Psychology Review, 13, 292-301.
Hagborg, W. J. (1987). Hearing-impaired students and sociometric ratings: An exploratory study. Volta Review, 89, 221-228.
Hagborg, W. J. (1988). A study of the intensity and frequency of crisis intervention for students enrolled in a school for the severely emotionally disturbed. Adolescence, 92, 825-836.
Hagborg, W. J. (1989). A sociometric investigation of sex and race preferences among deaf adolescents. American Annals of the Deaf, 134, 265-267.
Hagborg, W. J. (1990). The Revised Behavior Problem Checklist and severely emotionally disturbed adolescents: Relationship to intelligence, academic achievement, and sociometric ratings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 47-53.
Hagborg, W. J. (1991). Group counseling with emotionally handicapped early adolescents: Challenges and useful procedures. Adolescence, 26, 557-563.
Hartup, W. W. (1970). Peer interaction and social organization. In P.H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (pp. 35-98). New York: Wiley.
Hartup, W. W. (1989). Social relationships and their developmental significance. American Psychologist, 44, 120-126.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1990). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
Kennedy, P., & Bruininks, R. H. (1974). Social status of hearing impaired children in regular classrooms. Exceptional Children, 40, 336-342.
Kistner, J. A., & Gatlin, D. F. (1989). Sociometric differences between learningdisabled and nonhandicapped students: Effects of sex and race. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 118-120.
Morgan, S. R. (1977). A descriptive analysis of maladjusted behavior of socially rejected children. Behavioral Disorders, 3, 23-30.
Morrison, G. M. (1981). Sociometric measurement: Methodological considerations of its use with mildly learning handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 193-201.
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389.
Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D.R. (1979). Manual for the Behavior Problem Checklist. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers State University.
Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1987). Manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Available from the senior author at P. 0. Box 248074, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124.
Singleton, L. C., & Asher, S. R. (1979). Racial integration and children's peer preferences: An investigation of developmental and cohort differences. Child Development, 50, 936-941.
Swanson, H. L., & Malone, S. (1992). Social skills and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the literature. School Psychology Review, 21, 427-443.
Wehlage, G., Rutter, R., Smith, G., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. (1990). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.