INDSCAL Multidimensional Scaling
Keywords:
INDSCAL, Multidimensional ScalingAbstract
Multidimensional Scaling via the Individual Differences Scaling (INDSCAL) computer program is applied to three basic small groups; consulting, family counseling, and interview group counseling. This article provides an introduction to this exciting advancement in group process and outcome assessments made possible through advances in psychophysics and computer technology. The uniqueness of
this process lies in its method for gathering data from group members insofar as it utilizes the unique perceptions of all group members and therefore it is not limited by the predetermined criteria of the clinician or researcher
References
Bales, R. F. Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, 1970.
Bales, R. F. SYMLOG case study kit. New York: Free Press, 1980.
Carroll, J. D. & Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multi-dimensional scaling
via a n-way generalization of 'Eckert-Young' decomposition. Psychometrika, 1970, 3 5 ,
238-319.
Coombs, C.H. Theory of data. New York: Wiley, 1964.
Hill, W. F. Hill interaction matrix. Los Angeles, California: University of Southern California,
Youth Studies Center, 1965.
Jones, L. E., & Young, F. W. Structure of a social environment: longitudinal individual
differences scaling of an intact group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,
24,108-121.
Lewis, P., Lissitz, R. W., & Jones, C. L. Assessment of change in interpersonal perception in
t-group using individual differences multidimensional scaling. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 1975, 22, 44-48.
Moreno, J. L. Sociometry: experimental method and the science of society. New York:
Beacon House, 1951.
Ross, R. T. Optimum orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934, 25, 375-382.
Sprouse, C. L., & Brush, D. H. Assessment of interpersonal perception: assessing a quasitherapy group by individual differences multidimensional scaling. Small Group Behavior, 1980, 11, 35-49.
Subkoviak, M. J. The use of multidimensional scaling in education research. Review of Educational Research, 1975, 45, 387-423.
Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 1927, 34, 273-286.
Zuk, C.H. Family therapy: A triadic-based approach. New York: Human Science Press, 1972.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.