Sex Differences in Group Communication:· Directions for Research in Speech Communications and Sociometry
Keywords:
Sociometry, Sex DifferencesAbstract
A review is made of historical and contemporary research on differences between male and female participation and leadership in problem-solving group discussion. A summary of two exploratory studies suggests the need for current study of female and male communication in groups. From these two areas follows a discussion of lines of research appropriate to scholars in speech communication and sociometry
References
Baird, J. E., Jr. Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62, 179-92.
Baird, J. E., Jr. and P. H. Bradley. Styles of management and communication: A comparative study of men and women. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 101-111.
Bales, R. F. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1950.
Bass, B. M., J. Drusell and R. A. Alexander. Male managers: attitudes toward working women. American Behavioral Scientist, 1971, 15, 221-36.
Bennett, E. M. and L. R. Cohen. Men and women: Personality patterns and contrasts. Genetic Psychology Monographs. 1959, 59, 101-55.
Berg, I. A. and B. M. Bass (Eds.). Conformity and Deviation. New York: Harper and Row, 1961.
Bond, J. R. and W. E. Vinacke. Coalitions in mixed sex triads. Sociometry, 1961, 24,,61-75.
Bormann, E.G., J. Pratt and L. Putnam. Power, authority and sex: Male response to female leadership. Communication Monographs, 1978, 45, 119-55.
Bowman, G. W., N. B. Worthy and S. A. Greyser. Are women executives people? Harvard Business Review, 1965,4, 14-16.
Carey, G. Sex differences in problem-solving performance as a function of attitude differences. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 256-60.
Day, R. and R. M. Stogdill. Leader behavior of male and female supervisors: A comparative study. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 353-60.
Gerrard, M., J. Oliver and M. Williams (Eds.). Women in Management. Austin, Texas: Center for Social Work Research, 1976.
Heiss, J. S. Degree of intimacy and male-female interaction. Sociometry, 1962, 25, 197-208.
Hosti, O. R. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
Kaess, W. A., S. L. Witryol and R. E. Nolan. Reliability, sex differences and validity in the leaderless group discussion technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1961, 45, 345-50.
Kramer, C. Women's speech: separate but unequal. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 14-24.
Landis, M. and H. Burtt. A study of conversations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1924, 3, 81-89.
Maier, N. R. F. Male versus female discussion leaders. Personnel Psychology, 1970, 23, 45561. •
Megaree, E. I. Influence of sex roles on manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 377-82.
Milton, G. The effects of sex-role identification upon problem-solving skill. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 219-44.
Moreno, J. L. Who shall survive? Washington, D.C.: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co., 1934.
Moreno, J. L. Foundations of Sociometry. Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama, 1977, 30, 1-12 (originally published in 1941).
Orth, C. D. and F. Jacobs. Women in management: pattern for change. Harvard Business Review, 1971, 49, 139-47.
Rosenfeld, L.B. and G . D . Fowler. Personality, sex and leadership style. Communication Monographs, 1976, 43, 320-24.
Stewart, F. A. A study of influence in Southtown: II. Sociometry, 1961, 24, 61-75.
Strodtbeck, F. Husband-wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociological Review, 1951, 16, 14145.
Strodtbeck, F. and R. D. Mann. Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 1956, 19, 3-11.
Terman, L. M. A preliminary study of the psychology and pedagogy of leadership. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1904, 11, 413-51.
Terman, L. M. and C. C. Miles. Sex and Personality: Studies in Masculinity and Femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
Uesugi, T. T. and W. E. Vinacke. Strategy in a feminine game. Sociometry, 1963, 26, 45-88.
Wood, J. T. Alternate portraits of leaders: A contingency approach to perceptions of leadership. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1979, 43, 260-70.
Wood, M. The influence of sex and knowledge of communication effectiveness on spontaneous speech. Word, 1966, 22, 112-37.
Yerby, J. Attitude, task and sex composition as variables affecting female leadership in small problem-solving groups. Speech Monographs, 197 5, 42, 164-68.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.