Sex Differences in Group Communication:· Directions for Research in Speech Communications and Sociometry
Keywords:
Sociometry, Sex DifferencesAbstract
A review is made of historical and contemporary research on differences between male and female participation and leadership in problem-solving group discussion. A summary of two exploratory studies suggests the need for current study of female and male communication in groups. From these two areas follows a discussion of lines of research appropriate to scholars in speech communication and sociometry
References
Baird, J. E., Jr. Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1976, 62, 179-92.
Baird, J. E., Jr. and P. H. Bradley. Styles of management and communication: A comparative study of men and women. Communication Monographs, 1979, 46, 101-111.
Bales, R. F. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1950.
Bass, B. M., J. Drusell and R. A. Alexander. Male managers: attitudes toward working women. American Behavioral Scientist, 1971, 15, 221-36.
Bennett, E. M. and L. R. Cohen. Men and women: Personality patterns and contrasts. Genetic Psychology Monographs. 1959, 59, 101-55.
Berg, I. A. and B. M. Bass (Eds.). Conformity and Deviation. New York: Harper and Row, 1961.
Bond, J. R. and W. E. Vinacke. Coalitions in mixed sex triads. Sociometry, 1961, 24,,61-75.
Bormann, E.G., J. Pratt and L. Putnam. Power, authority and sex: Male response to female leadership. Communication Monographs, 1978, 45, 119-55.
Bowman, G. W., N. B. Worthy and S. A. Greyser. Are women executives people? Harvard Business Review, 1965,4, 14-16.
Carey, G. Sex differences in problem-solving performance as a function of attitude differences. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958, 56, 256-60.
Day, R. and R. M. Stogdill. Leader behavior of male and female supervisors: A comparative study. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 353-60.
Gerrard, M., J. Oliver and M. Williams (Eds.). Women in Management. Austin, Texas: Center for Social Work Research, 1976.
Heiss, J. S. Degree of intimacy and male-female interaction. Sociometry, 1962, 25, 197-208.
Hosti, O. R. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
Kaess, W. A., S. L. Witryol and R. E. Nolan. Reliability, sex differences and validity in the leaderless group discussion technique. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1961, 45, 345-50.
Kramer, C. Women's speech: separate but unequal. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 14-24.
Landis, M. and H. Burtt. A study of conversations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1924, 3, 81-89.
Maier, N. R. F. Male versus female discussion leaders. Personnel Psychology, 1970, 23, 45561. •
Megaree, E. I. Influence of sex roles on manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 377-82.
Milton, G. The effects of sex-role identification upon problem-solving skill. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 219-44.
Moreno, J. L. Who shall survive? Washington, D.C.: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co., 1934.
Moreno, J. L. Foundations of Sociometry. Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama, 1977, 30, 1-12 (originally published in 1941).
Orth, C. D. and F. Jacobs. Women in management: pattern for change. Harvard Business Review, 1971, 49, 139-47.
Rosenfeld, L.B. and G . D . Fowler. Personality, sex and leadership style. Communication Monographs, 1976, 43, 320-24.
Stewart, F. A. A study of influence in Southtown: II. Sociometry, 1961, 24, 61-75.
Strodtbeck, F. Husband-wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociological Review, 1951, 16, 14145.
Strodtbeck, F. and R. D. Mann. Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 1956, 19, 3-11.
Terman, L. M. A preliminary study of the psychology and pedagogy of leadership. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1904, 11, 413-51.
Terman, L. M. and C. C. Miles. Sex and Personality: Studies in Masculinity and Femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936.
Uesugi, T. T. and W. E. Vinacke. Strategy in a feminine game. Sociometry, 1963, 26, 45-88.
Wood, J. T. Alternate portraits of leaders: A contingency approach to perceptions of leadership. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1979, 43, 260-70.
Wood, M. The influence of sex and knowledge of communication effectiveness on spontaneous speech. Word, 1966, 22, 112-37.
Yerby, J. Attitude, task and sex composition as variables affecting female leadership in small problem-solving groups. Speech Monographs, 197 5, 42, 164-68.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.