THE USE OF NETWORK CONCEPTS IN AN EDUCATIONAL MODEL
Keywords:
EDUCATIONAL MODEL, NETWORK CONCEPTSAbstract
As clinicians expand the context within which they view clients from the individual to the group and family to the social network, forms for working in the wider context need to be developed. Certainly, meeting with the whole network is as different from talking about the network as meeting with the whole family is from talking about the family-both in terms of assessment and treatment options. Large scale network interventions require large expenditures of resources, however, and are often not practical.
References
Attneave, C. Family Network Map. Seattle, 1975, 1977.
Attneave, C. Therapy in Tribal Settings and Urban Network Intervention. Family Process, September 1969, 8, 192-210.
Clark, A. W. Patient Participation and Improvement in a Therapeutic Community. Human Relations, 1967, 20, 259-271.
Clark, A. W. The Personality and Social Network Adjustment Scale. Human Relations, 1968, 25, 85-95.
Cresswell, R. How Mrs. G. Built Up a Winning Pack. Community Care, January 26, 1976, 18--19.
Erickson, G. The Concept of Personal Network in Clinical Practice. Family Process, 1977, 16, 487-498.
Fine, P. An Appraisal of Child Psychiatry. Family Process, 1972, I 1, 279-293.
Rueveni, U. Network Intervention with a Family in Crisis. Family Process, 1975, 14, 193-204.
Speck, R. and C. Attneave. Family Networks. New York: Vintage Books, 1973.
Weiss, R. S. The Provisions of Social Relationships. In. D. Kubin (Ed.), Doing Unto Others: Joining, Molding, Confirming, Helping, Loving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Psychodrama, Sociometry, and Group Psychotherapy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.